Stop Making Sense

inside the wormholeI spend a lot of time within the social media bubble, where no one (any more) questions the value of Twitter. But I also spend time outside of the bubble, which is not always easy (but very important if you ask me). And outside the bubble, you hear what  we’ve been hearing for years: “I just don’t get Twitter. Why would I care what you had for lunch?”

I have lots of answers for that question. I talk about how I’ve always known what my co-workers have for lunch when they walk by with their McDonald’s bag or heat up their curry in the microwave. It’s as equally unimpressive as reading it on Twitter,  but it means something in both cases because it’s a part of my deeper connection to them as human beings. I don’t love them any more or less, but I do know them better, and that level of familiarity ends up enhancing our working relationship. Twitter, through it’s relatively inane exchanges, often opens up new relationships that bring the potential for more learning, growing, collaborating, etc.

Some people outside the bubble resonate with what I am saying, and others don’t. But I’m beginning to wonder: does it matter if Twitter makes sense? Do I really need to convince those outside the bubble that this Twitter thing is for real? Part of me says yes–I don’t want to be one of those blind bubble inhabitants that curses the nonbelievers (if they don’t get Twitter, then forget’em!).

But part of me says no. Working hard to have social media “make sense” to our old way of seeing the world is not necessarily the right thing to do. It’s not wrong, per se, but it may not be helpful. It’s like the early quantum physicists trying to force the laws of Newtonian physics to work at the subatomic level as they were striving for their grand theory of everything. It just doesn’t translate. What allowed the theory of quantum mechanics to be articulated was the scientists actively giving up on trying to have it make sense in the Newtonian world view. When they let go of that requirement, they discovered the calculations that worked.

Okay, I admit I might be pushing the boundaries of esoteric here, but I think it’s worth thinking about, particularly in the context of the social organization. We have very definite views of what makes sense in organizations, from our hierarchies, to our strategic planning, to our human resource management best practices. Social media frequently doesn’t fit with these views, and I’m suggesting that maybe we shouldn’t try to make it fit. Maybe we should suspend disbelief and start from a place that discards our old rules and limitations. Let’s try things based on new rules that don’t make sense and see where it takes us. That’s what social media did, and it has been very successful. I think we’re at a similar point with our organizations–partially due to social media. Just like quantum physicists needed the tools to give them access to the subatomic world, social media is giving us the tools to re-consider our understanding of the way organizations can work. Maybe if we stop making sense, we’ll discover a path out of this mess.

Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Nicely said, Jamie. However, I think that you're dangerously close to being paraphrased as saying "paradigm shift." :-) That's not to say that your points are not valid, they most certainly are. The struggle is in how to make those points without regressing to vacuous terminology from 10+ years ago. How do we get people to just hold off on evaluating everything based on how they've been doing things in the past. The closest thing that I can come to is that it's a bit of a culture shock thing. E.g.: when in Asia do not compare what you see based on North American norms.

Cheers!

Ah, the dreaded "P-Word!" Yes, I try not to speak too much of paradigms, for fear someone will jump up and shout "bingo" because they were playing buzzword bingo without me noticing. Better yet, I need to whip up my paradigm slides, complete with a two-by-two matrix and a venn diagram with three overlapping circles!

Seriously, I do struggle with the language to describe this, because if I use language that is too comfortable for people, they will too easily assimilate my points into their current view (which will likely change the meaning of my points, as I am intending to change their current view). But if I insist on radically different terminology, I can easily be dismissed as using consultant-speak or being out of touch.

I like the international travel metaphor. I'll have to use that and see what reaction I get. Thanks for commenting!

Previous post:

Next post: